A recent class-action lawsuit filed in a Nevada federal court has accused the popular Wheel of Fortune slot machines of deceiving players and defrauding them out of their money. The lawsuit alleges that the bonus-wheel game, based on the game show, gives players a false sense of equal odds of winning when in reality, the outcome is predetermined by an internal computer.
The plaintiffs argue that the association with the TV show creates a false perception among players, leading them to believe they have an equal chance of winning all prizes. The lawsuit names IGT as the manufacturer and distributor, along with several casino operators, including MGM Resorts and Bally’s Corp.
While it is true that the Wheel of Fortune slot uses a random number generator (RNG) to determine outcomes, players do not have an equal chance of hitting each money amount on the wheel. However, all players do have an equal chance of winning each money amount, making the game fair according to regulators.
Slot machines are programmed with a theoretical payout percentage, or return to player (RTP), which varies by jurisdiction. The RTP is set by the manufacturer in compliance with regulations, and regulators must approve the RNGs and game codes for each machine.
Despite the lawsuit’s claims, regulators in Nevada and other jurisdictions have approved the dynamics of the Wheel of Fortune slots year after year. Since Nevada has laws legalizing slots and authorizes the Nevada Gaming Commission to regulate them, it may be challenging for a federal judge to find merit in the lawsuit.
In conclusion, while the lawsuit alleges that the Wheel of Fortune slot machines deceive players, the game operates within the parameters set by regulators. The association with the TV show may create false perceptions, but the game’s mechanics have been approved by gaming authorities. It remains to be seen how this lawsuit will progress in federal court.
