The news that CBS has decided not to fact-check JD Vance and Tim Walz during the vice presidential debate has sparked mixed reactions. Some view this decision as an act of cowardice and a failure of journalism, while others are skeptical about the accuracy of this information.
Journalists play a crucial role in moderating debates, going beyond mere timekeeping to ensure a meaningful conversation that sheds light on the candidates. Moderators should be prepared to challenge any misinformation or distortions presented by politicians, guiding the debate towards clarity and truth.
In the era of Donald Trump, who has been known for spreading falsehoods at an unprecedented rate, the role of fact-checkers becomes even more crucial. While it is true that the job of fact-checking remains the same, the unique challenges posed by Trump’s lies require a different approach.
It is essential for moderators to be well-informed about the topics being discussed and the individuals involved, enabling them to distinguish between typical political evasion and outright lies. The obligation to hold politicians accountable for their statements should not be compromised, even in the face of relentless misinformation.
Criticism of moderators for fact-checking more aggressively during debates involving Trump is understandable, given the magnitude and frequency of his falsehoods. However, it is important to differentiate between typical political behavior and dangerous deceit, ensuring that lies are not normalized or overlooked.
As the upcoming vice presidential debate approaches, the responsibility falls on CBS moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan to uphold the standards of journalism and prevent misinformation from spreading unchecked. Despite the challenges posed by candidates like Vance, who has a history of fabricating stories, moderators must remain vigilant in their pursuit of truth.
In the face of criticism and challenges, journalists must stand firm in their commitment to accuracy and integrity. Allowing external pressures to dictate their approach would undermine the principles of journalism and distort the truth. By remaining steadfast in their duty to inform the public, journalists can uphold the values of their profession and ensure that history judges their actions favorably.